Going Rogue

November 17th, 2009 by Hoopleton

Sarah Palin wrote a memoir. I think it’s best we accept the fact and move on.

A blog is no place to ridicule people. It’s not a place to point out obvious flaws and shortcomings. Sarah Palin may appear to be an idiot. Some may go as far as to assume she’s illiterate. She doesn’t strike one as a “reader,” they may say. How does someone who’s illiterate write an autobiography?

Sarah Palin is not illiterate. Besides she had help. She had a ghostwriter. However the publisher informs us that she was very involved. Of course she’d be involved, it’s a memoir. Duh.

The title of the “autobiography” is Going Rogue. I do not plan to elude to the obvious pornographic double meanings of the phrase. I will not drag this blog into the gutter. I will not sling filth over the internet. In the same vein please do not expect any tangent dealing with the very many hugely popular x-rated films inspired by the former Alaskan governor, nor any mention of Levi Johnston’s (the nineteen-year-old father to Sarah Palin’s grandson Tripp) upcoming Playgirl photo spread. I will not mention any of these things because Sarah Palin is a serious, respectful person deserving of our respect.

Sarah Palin is not a breathing, walking, talking punchline.

Sarah Palin is not some high and mighty, elitist, intellectual, tax and spend, inside the beltway politico. She’s just like us! She’s Jane-sixpack. She’s a hockeymom. She may not know how to find Iraq on a map. She may not who the President of [fill in the blank] is, but she’s good God-fearing people.

We all know Katie Couric is most likely an embittered old shrew, a soulless cog in the vast liberal media conspiracy. We all know that the McCain campaign was out to derail their own nominee from the start. That the Republican Party forced her to wear expensive designer clothes. She didn’t enjoy any of it. She didn’t ask for any of it. It’s not as though she gained personally or politically from it. She would’ve made it on the cover of Newsweek all by herself. Darn right!

Sarah Palin is not a colossal hypocrite. She doesn’t even know the meaning of the word. I refuse to add the word “literally” to the end of the previous sentence. I refuse to comment on her apparent utter lack of experience, intelligence, empathy or forward thinking. She doesn’t buy into any of that Stalinist labeling anyway.

I will not comment on Sarah Palin in this blog. I’m not a hatchet man and this is not the forum for slander, finger pointing, name calling or settling personal scores, that’s what a memoir is for.

Short List – TV Dramas (2009)

September 29th, 2009 by Hoopleton

So the economy is still shit and the weather is getting frigid in an awful hurry. It’s the season of swine flu and manic depression. Luckily for us television is here to the rescue! No seriously. Once you dig through the intellectual paralysis that is reality infotainment and the plethora of nauseating primetime soaps (Grey’s Anatomy *cough*) there are actually things worth watching on the old idiot box. To help sift through the muck I present to you this short list of of the best shows on television –drama edition.

1. House. Dying of an incurable, extremely rare medical condition and need it cured in forty-three minutes you say? All right, so House is hardly the most believable medical drama on television. God knows it’s no Grey’s Anatomy. Am I right? But Hugh Laurie is fucking awesome so just shut up you mean stupid bastard. Now entering its sixth season on television House may be the exception that proves the rule, something popular can also be good. That’s not to say I’m admitting defeat. In fact I would argue that some of the best episodes in the series were those that suffered some of the worst ratings. I’ll go even as far as to say that season five, which saw Dr. House losing his mind and which also happened to see the show drop down to 19th place in its time slot, was by far the best year in the show’s entire run. Season six may have started off with a whimper (come on, House in the loony bin? Talk about some missed opportunities), but it’s still early yet and I doubt that our intrepid atheist, drug-addict has gone soft just yet. As long as the writers are willing to take ever greater risks with their material and their star, House promises to deliver year after year. Who knows? The way things have been going maybe the best is yet to come.

2. Dexter. Now beginning its fourth season on Showtime, this one-hour drama about a sympathetic serial killer has certainly been better. The halcyon days were probably those back in season two when Dexter Morgan (played by Michael C. Hall), the prolific killer who butchers Miami-based bad guys, spent the entire season within a hair’s breath of being found out by the hapless police force that also happens to employ him. Oh Doukes, we miss you. Sure, the run wasn’t perfect that year. God knows Lila (played by Jaime Murray) was irritating beyond words, but overall it was an exceptionally strong follow-up to the debut. In many ways the show surpassed expectation. So it was perhaps not surprising that despite some thrilling moments and a great turn by Jimmy Smits season three came out to be bland and in the final verdict disappointing. The age old question applies: how can you keep a serial killer story from becoming overly repetitive? Fortunately Dexter is one of those shows that’s just too good to give up on. Despite the fact that Dexter is now a dad (a recent annoying television trend that makes me think most industry writers just turned thirty) season four looks somewhat promising with the addition of John Lithgow to the cast as the “Trinity” killer. Lithgow may not be as creepy as say Christopher Walken, but in this role he’s certainly somewhere in the ballpark. Besides, it’s Dexter, a show about a deviate mass murderer who’s living right next door, and you know what? You find yourself rooting for him every step of the way. Take that moral ambiguity!

3. Damages. Yea, I know, you’ve never heard of it. Most people haven’t, which is why the critically acclaimed “legal drama” from the cable network FX, now entering its third season, was nearly cancelled despite having won several Emmys including two by the show’s star, Glenn Close. Yes, Glenn Close. TELEVISION IS A PERFECTLY RESPECTABLE MEDIUM! The show revolves around the brilliant and ruthless, nay, Machiavellian, New York lawyer, Patty Hughes (Close) and her equally brilliant although not nearly as ruthless (but she’s getting there) protégée Ellen Parsons (played by Rose Byrne). That’s the tip off, from there the series spirals out of control into a veritable firestorm of political intrigue, betrayal, murder and corporate greed. Coming into the show midstream may be a bit disorienting given the layers upon layers of twists and turns not to mention the nonlinear narrative that binds the whole thing together, but to watch it from the beginning is to feel gobs of guilty satisfaction and a strange desire to finally pursue that law degree. Damages is good drama but that depicts human fallibility, strength and corruption across the full spectrum. One episode’s villain may be the next episode’s hero and in the end it’ll only really make sense when the entire puzzle is filled in.

4. Fringe. Hey, do you remember when The X-Files was good? You know, back before David Duchovny got all fat and someone saying “the truth is out there” didn’t make you want to vomit? Well imagine a show like what The X-Files used to be except in which all the stupid alien bounty hunter crap is actually believable and the cast is way sexier (sorry Scully). Now entering its second season, FOX’s Fringe follows the efforts of FBI agents (and their assorted collection of consultants) as they investigate “the Pattern,” a series of unexplained, often ghastly occurrences which are happening all over the world (though mainly in New England), leading to what, we cannot say. Despite being created by J.J. Abrams the series features an assortment of interesting characters most notable among them special agent Olivia Dunham (played by the alluring Anna Trov) and mad scientist Walter Bishop (John Noble). So far this show has done a fantastic job of weaving sci-fi mystery without giving too much away. Of course how long can you keep pushing the envelope of reality before the whole thing becomes a ridiculous farce, nearly even becoming a parody of itself? If The X-Files is any indication, up until the moment that the star of the show marries Téa Leoni. A frighteningly real possibility since she came back on the market not long ago. You’ve been warned. On the plus side we may get another Bree Sharp song out of it and a return performance by Robert Patrick as Doggett. Come on, who didn’t like Doggett?

5. Caprica. Okay fine, the show won’t actually debut till January, but I miss Battlestar Galactica so frak off. The prequel to Syfy’s groundbreaking, dark and twisted reimagined Battlestar, Caprica follows the path of humanity toward the apocalypse. Billed more as family saga than space opera the two-hour pilot premiered in April to rave reviews, serving as backstory to a series with huge expectations and even larger potential. There’s not much to say about the series yet, but it’s going to be the greatest thing on television ever. What? You don’t agree? Well then why don’t you go back to Soviet Russia comrade, we don’t need the likes of you around here. Now if you excuse me, I need to go watch the pilot again, and again, and again, and again, and again…

6. Mad Men. At first glance this much talked about, highly acclaimed AMC original series now in its third season seems to move along so slowly that you begin to wonder how anyone in our insta-world can possibly stay focused on its subtly unfolding plot turns for longer than five seconds. Then you realize how utterly brilliant the show is and you start to wonder why more people aren’t watching it. Then you realize most people are idiots. Then you start craving a cigarette. The show, which follows the highs and lows of life for Madison Avenue advertising executives (well, actually that of pretty much anyone tied to the profession) and their families in the 1960s, does a masterful job of depicting life during a period of unprecedented social upheaval in this nation’s history. Whether it’s the constant smoking, rampant alcoholism, institutionalized racism or casual adultery it’s hard not to marvel at how much things have changed in the last fifty years, and also how much they’ve stayed the same. The subject of gender is central to Mad Men, not only in it’s frank look at the shifting role of women and the changing ideal of femininity, but also the deconstruction of the masculine. Through the eyes of the impressive cast, but most notably, of course, Don Draper (played by John Hamm so effectively you’d think he was brought to Hollywood in a time machine) the series is social criticism built upon the study of human weakness. As far as pure entertainment value, the series reveals new shocks and twists with every episode. Just as you think you’ve got it all figured out someone gets their foot sliced off by a lawnmower. Mad Men is a show that only seems to get better with each season and it remains, for now, the benchmark for every other dramatic series on air. With the Cuban Missile Crisis behind us and the assassination of JFK weeks away, there’s never been a better time to pour yourself an Old Fashioned, light a Lucky and tune in.

Grey’s Anatomy

September 27th, 2009 by Hoopleton

The primetime soap Grey’s Anatomy is much like a two-dollar wine cooler. It’s pink, bright and in single doses leaves you completely empty and unsatisfied. Overconsumption will invariably lead to nausea, vomiting, an inability to operate machinery or motor vehicles and in the long-term force you, the viewer, to finally realize what a cheap, easy whore you really are.

But wait, you say, why so negative man? Just because something’s popular doesn’t mean it’s bad.

Well, first of all, that’s not true. If something popular isn’t bad right out of the monkey factory it invariably becomes bad as a direct result of its popularity. Remember how good Weeds was before people started watching it? Dexter? Remember how bad everything on the CW always was and always will be? And look at the flip side. Notice how consistently awesome Mad Men is despite the fact that four of us ever tune in? How The Wire never lost its edge? Popularity is like snake venom, it spreads slowly but without antivenin can cause paralysis and increasingly bad writing, eventually death.

Second, the popularity adage was most certainly coined by a television executive at some forth-rate network (say ABC), who was hoping to preemptively defend himself against the inevitable charge of crimes against humanity that will be brought against all television executives in the not-too-distant future for their culpability in the destruction of human culture.

At this “trial of the millennium,” as I’m sure it will come to be known by a traumatized and fearful global population, prosecutors will play hours upon hours of sitcom footage, reality TV shows, and of course, reruns of Grey’s Anatomy.

“There were worst things on television,” the chief prosecutor will say, his eyes heavy, his brow twisted into knots, “but few other programs did as much harm.”

Now that the show is in its sixth season I often wonder what it was like all those years ago when Grey’s Anatomy was being conceived.

So okay, we have a group of superficial, mean-spirited, emotionally stunted, self-absorbed assholes and all they do is fuck each other’s brains out in a hospital. Can some of them be lesbians?

And… scene!

It’s one of those shows that’s very hard to critique in any rational way as even after watching every season it seems like the episodes just blend into eachother until eventually everything becomes consumed by the gallons of oil pouring out of Patrick Dempsey’s hair. And so instead of forming constructive thoughts you find yourself sobbing in a corner wondering if Izzie will ever win her battle with cancer, if Cristina will finally let someone into her heart or whether Elizabeth will just settle down already. You find meaning in the show’s pop-philosophy/Oprah brand self-help “this is what life is all about” narration. And life changes. People become more beautiful and you feel less obligated to care for anyone other than yourself. It’s nice to live in a universe where women stop maturing past their teens and all men are just boys with a fetish for lip fuzz. Fuck any sense of mutual morality, I’m a heartless douchebag with great hair.

Hey look! That woman they gave that face transplant to is hot now too! Better go buy some of the music I heard on the show and go to the park where I can snicker at the ugly people, cause God knows if someone doesn’t fit into a McDreamy/McSteamy classification system they just aren’t worth my time!

God, like I totally agree! Do you have forth period lunch? We can go give one another handjobs in the parking lot.

Wait, where was I?

Why am I in a lab coat and why are my pants gone?

Film Review – Star Trek

May 8th, 2009 by Hoopleton

Lately, Hollywood seems obsessed with the reset button. Taking a classic movie franchise, and or television series, and essentially reinventing it for our modern times. This concept has worked brilliantly with shows like Battlestar Galactica and big screen icons such as Batman and James Bond, but the idea of reimagining Star Trek somehow seemed doomed to fail from the beginning. The television and movie franchise had been dead for years, after a seemingly endless series of dull and increasingly nerdy incarnations. Add to this a fanatical, near dogmatic fan base bound to lynch someone if things didn’t fit perfectly into the Roddenberry canon. When you consider all this it’s hard to conceive how the new, reset Star Trek ever got the green light in the first place. Luckily for us it did. Just as with Bond, Batman and Battlestar, the newest Trek installment manages to walk a fine line while delivering something fresh, new and truly exciting.

The big box J.J. Abrams, Star Trek swings wildly over the top with action and special effects, while at the same time abandoning the campy clutter of the past. The cast, taking on the roles of the original series, is young and sexy. The universe they inhabit is stark and real, with fine shades of darkness thrown into the mix. Whereas in past Treks the cosmos seemed a crowded place, here the stars are cold and distant. The technology, once imagined as profoundly devoid of grime, here is sleek, but also has the appearance of actually being built and operated with human hands. The story, although still slightly cumbersome, isn’t dull for a moment. In fact, when the end credits come onto the screen, it’s a little hard to let go.

This Star Trek (at least two sequels are already planned) is an origin story first and foremost. Just as Batman Begins much of the film is dedicated to laying the foundation. We learn about the rise of James Tiberius Kirk (played with young Shatner-like charm by Chris Pine) and his soon-to-be alter ego, Mr. Spock (Zachary Quinto perfectly cast as a young Leonard Nimoy). We’re introduced to a smoking sexy Uhura (Zoe Saldana), a gruff Dr. McCoy (Karl Urban), a hyper Pavel Chekov (played by scene stealing Anton Yelchin) and a short list of other faces with familiar names, each adding a new energy that excites and proves surprisingly nostalgic.

I won’t get into the plot, for fear of giving too much away, but I will say that the central theme of the movie is the interplay between Pine’s Kirk and Quinto’s Spock. I dare say that not even the original series was able to so faithfully capture the dichotomy and comradeship of two such seemingly opposite personalities. The chemistry between the two, even when adversarial, is electric.

When all is said and done Star Trek is just pure fun, glowing with a subtle aura of realism. The challenge for Abrams and company in the years to come will be to bring that realism out into the foreground. But as I said, this is just the foundation. This film is very much background. None the less it’s definitely worth the price of admission. A thrill ride that no longer requires a membership card.

Review & Critique — Valkerie/Defiance

January 8th, 2009 by Hoopleton

With the world falling apart it might seem like an odd time for a movie review, especially of films I haven’t seen nor ever plan to, but as a sometime historian I feel it’s my duty to shine the critical light on cinematic works that purport to be based on actual events.

Valkyrie, a film directed by Bryan Singer and starring Tom Cruise, is the story of Colonel Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, a German colonel who led a plot to assassinate Hitler in 1944. Skimming over the fact that Tom Cruise is far too creepy to convincingly play even a German officer during World War II, let alone far too American to play anything other than an American, and also ignoring the more dramatized events in the film (i.e. Tom Cruise is shown barely making it out of the explosion that is meant to kill Hitler when in reality Stauffenberg was already miles away when his ill positioned bomb detonated), the movie is by all accounts another fairy tale revision of actual history in which the lines between good and evil are so clearly drawn that the good guys might as well be wearing white hats.

It is accurate that Stauffenberg was outraged at the murderous campaign against the Jews, but he was also a devout German nationalist whose main contention with Hitler was not his anti-semitism but his misconduct of the war against the Soviet Union. The assassination of the Fuhrer was conditioned on the possibility of signing a separate peace with the Western Allies and was predicated on several demands. These demands included Germany’s right to retain territorial gains in Poland and Austria, the extension of current occupied territory south, as well as an allied commitment to continue the war against the Communists and the right of refusal to hand over war criminals.

In other words, the plot to kill Hitler was not some idealistic attempt to usher in world peace, but instead a rearranging of deck chairs on the Titanic.

In a similar vein comes the film Defiance, directed by Edward Zwick and starring, among others, Daniel Craig and Liev Schreiber. The film is tagged as the true story of a Jewish resistance unit that bravely defied the Nazis. Again forgoing an examination of Daniel Craig’s inability to star in a film that doesn’t involve gun violence or Liev Schreiber’s unhealthy obsession with World War II (although Everything Is Illuminated was an exceptionally excellent film), this movie, just as Valkyrie attempts to make saints out of sinners, or at the very least, make overly simplistic morality tales out of what are in fact very complicated histories.

Tuvia Bielski (played by Craig) was, it is true, the leader of a Jewish resistance group that evaded the Nazis and on occasion struck at Nazi targets in an attempt to aid the approaching Red Army, but Tuvia was hardly a shining knight. Although he did save over a thousand lives from certain execution his violence against suspected collaborators and captured Germans was often beyond brutal (he was reported to have executed entire families and even dismembered prisoners while they were still alive). More so, in 1943, Tuvia and his resistance fighters were most likely involved in the Soviet-backed massacre of 128 Polish civilians (Stalin led a bloody campaign against the Poles when the Russians “liberated” the country at the end of the war, often using Russian friendly groups to decimate entire communities). For the better part of sixty years allegations have also circulated that his righteous few often engaged in frequent terror attacks on local Polish communities, stealing food, burning down homes and even murdering the innocent. Some have even said that his work with the Russians helped in destroying the Polish Resistance and aided in the transformation of Poland into a Communist state. None of this is depicted in the film.

My main issue with Defiance is not that a movie was made about Tuvia Bielski, as a person will often become that which he abhors in order to defeat it (what horrible crimes would we have committed if we were alive then?), but to completely ignore such evil acts is an injustice not only to Tuvia’s victims but also to our collective memory.

The reason I will not watch Valkyrie or Defiance is the same reason why I will not watch any World War II movie these days, because far too often these films paint a brutal period in history, in which nearly everyone had blood on their hands, as a clear lesson on the dichotomy between good and evil. The Nazis were all bad and we were all good. End of story. The history of the war is not so simplistic. Human nature is not so simplistic. Films like these fail to reveal the most significant lesson of war, that in such times there are no heroes. It’s easy to edit out the crimes and celebrate ourselves. It’s easy to forget we fire bombed Dresden and Tokyo that we dropped atomic bombs on cities filled with civilians. It’s easy to pretend that our GIs never executed prisoners or raped or pillaged. It’s easy to forget that we too had concentration camps or left untold destruction in our wake. As Robert McNamara once said, “If we had lost the war we would’ve been tried as war criminals.” But we didn’t lose and so we get to airbrush our flaws out of memory.

By presenting two-dimensional accounts of World War II, if not history in general, Hollywood helps to perpetuate that worst of American flaws: the glorification of war. So entire generations, brought up on recruitment ads that make almost no mention that a major job requirement of the military is murder, are led to believe in the false premise that one can commit violence without blackening one’s soul. I’m not saying that fighting the Nazis wasn’t just or that it wasn’t crucial, what I am saying is that to excuse ourselves so completely is the worst kind of self-denial. Pure good and pure evil simply don’t exist and it’s the belief in such absolutes that constantly pushes us toward absolute action. Without middle ground how can there be compromise? Without understanding of our own demons how can there be peace in places like the Middle East? How can there ever truly be equality and tolerance?

Introspection isn’t easy, truth isn’t easy, but it most definitely is something we need.

Music Review — Jupiter One, Post Historic, Dan Wallace

September 19th, 2008 by Hoopleton

It always surprises me when crowds jam weekend summer festivals featuring over-hyped pop bands and untalented solo artists who rely solely on ego to get them through a forty minute set, while musicians with authenticity and soul play to near empty venues on sporadic weekday nights.

Tuesday, September 16th, Martyrs’ Pub on the north side of the Windy City. The bar was half empty and only one or two liquored up drunks stumbled onto the dance floor, which was a real shame because the music was at times stirring at other times electrifying, but always exemplifying what is so desperately missing in most of Chicago’s music scene.

Jupiter One, a band out of New York, brought so much energy to Martyrs’ on Tuesday night that it was nearly impossible to keep from spinning in circles on the floor. Part Talking Heads, part Cure, and a list of other 70s and 80s club indie rock bands, but at the same time wholly original, Jupiter One tore up the stage with such melodic intensity, rising vocals and a locomotive-like drum beat that had me wondering why these guys were being compared to Franz Ferdinand when clearly they should’ve been getting all the attention. Although perhaps the song Countdown with its near incendiary dance beats and weaving, airy, almost cosmic interchanges was my favorite, there was nothing in the band’s entire set that didn’t leave me craving more. Every song was solid, the play tight and clean, steadied by Dave Heilman’s impressive drum work and intensified by Mocha’s violin. The music alone was enough, but the icing on the cake was seeing K Ishibashi and Zac Colwell, Jupiter One’s founding members, lead guitar duo and vocalists, tear up the stage with so much enthusiasm that there was no doubt the music was as fun to play as it was to hear. In almost every way Jupiter One is clearly a professional working band on their way up the ladder. Solid and fun. If any criticism could be offered, is that although their sound is polished, some of what Jupiter One brings to the table has already been done. But if songs like The Miracle Of Flight off their debut album are any indication of their future direction, sparkling with electronic, nearly ambient beauty nestled in solid beats, this group has unlimited potential to go nowhere else but up.

The problem with the Chicago music scene is that it’s often both overwhelming and unremarkable. In the overcrowded gaggle of wannabe rock stars few acts seem to display anything bordering on originality. Amid the overpriced covers and water-downed drinks the music loses its impact as soon as the buzz wears off. The sad truth about the pop revolution of MySpace and other social networking sites is that musicians who have potential get lost in the shuffle, while glorified cover bands elicit enough attention to somehow garner a following, thus filling an entire generation of American Idol rejects with unjustified delusions of grandeur. But sometimes, in the bleak void of static pretending to be music there is promise of hope.

If other bands at Martyrs’ on September 16th made the heart race, it was Post Historic that made it sing. The trio from Champaign, Illinois, playing songs off their debut album, Memory Banks of Blue, showed that good songwriting still has a place in modern music and that something unique and wonderful can still be found amid the torrent of indistinguishable show listings in the daily rags. Part folk, part rock, but entirely soulful, Post Historic played a kind of music that isn’t really made anymore. Music with substance. Music that elicits feeling. Music that not only can make you sway, but sometimes has the power to just pin you back into your seat. Although their sound is not always unique, Post Historic is a solid guitar band, with the voice of lead singer Jesse Johnson at times seeming to waltz with the strings of the acoustic in his arms. Impressive also was Zach Benkowski on drums, setting the mood of every song, driving the speed. In many cases drummers can be detrimental to a band, in Post Historic that is not at all the case. But the star was Yoo Soo Kim, who not only seemed capable of playing every instrument in existence, but on songs like the moody and dark Jennifer Green, proved that wielding instruments like the violin can really be an act of artistry as much as skill. Having said all this I don’t want to give you the impression that Post Historic doesn’t know how to have fun. The trio could certainly crank up the volume, their eight track album is full of examples, but overall the real strength of this relatively young band is in its ability to strip away base pretension and recall a time when musicians actually played to feeling and not some packaged nostalgia tour more full of vanity than substance. The one issue I had with Post Historic is that it seemed like as yet they haven’t found their strengths. The absence of Jennifer Green on their debut album is a glaring omission. Just as in the case of Jupiter One, Post Historic would do well to get away from trying to be popular and emulating their influences.

With Bobby Conn away on creative hiatus and most of the local bands I know and love either far away on tour or simply missing in action, the live music scene in Chicago, as I think by now I’ve made abundantly clear, is nearly always not worth the price of admission. Bands like Jupiter One and Post Historic are certainly exceptions. However, these artists are imports. As luck would have it Chicago still has some talent of its own.

The featured artist at Martyrs’ was Dan Wallace, and he was certainly the reason why I even decided to show. Wallace is that rare breed of singer-songwriter who makes you question how half the crap on the radio even made it there in the first place. His lyrics, his basic understanding of composition and melody, his pure creativity rise head and shoulders above most of what comprises the mainstream. Over his four albums, the most recent entitled Reattachment, Wallace truly demonstrates depth and range, with songs like Odd Man Out hinting at folk and even classical influences, while songs like What I Know falling into a category of rock that goes far beyond any reliance on repetitive pop dribble. Wallace’s music has the capacity of being meaningful and dark, while staying fun, solidly rooted in interesting and engaging writing. There’s really nothing bad I can say about Wallace or his music. If I had any advice for those shopping around for a new artist to fall in love with, it would unquestioningly be him. Having said all that, the performance he gave at Martyrs’ on the 16th left something to be desired. The basic problem was this: it was all too painfully clear that Wallace was a solo artist, unfortunately, that night he was performing with a band. I can’t say whether the group hadn’t had time to really rehearse before the show, or if the members were simply thrown together last minute, but after experiencing the synergy (I hate that word by the way) of Jupiter One, the featured artist’s performance was, for lack of a better description, lacking. The only member of the ensemble that Dan really seemed to mesh with was the very impressive drummer, George Lawler, which makes sense as Lawler has appeared on Dan’s albums, including Reattachment, and clearly knew the music. I’d go so far to say that the night would have been better served if Wallace and Lawler had simply done a duet and ditched the other members all together. What it all boils down to is that Dan Wallace needs to just be Dan Wallace. Forget the stage theatrics or trying to rashly piece together the full sound, that’s what the albums are for, get on stage, plug in your guitar and let that amazing music shine. Though bringing George Lawler isn’t a bad idea either.

All in all I’d recommend Jupiter One, Post Historic and especially Dan Wallace to anyone feeling the heartbreak that so often is Chicago live music. These artists represent something truly good. So go out there, find their websites, buy their albums and see their shows.

On a closing note my apologies to On We, whose performance I missed that night at Martyrs’.

Film Review – The Dark Knight

July 17th, 2008 by Hoopleton

In the modern age of America, we the free and the brave, find ourselves ever more on a descending plunge into the unknown. Although our politics is consumed by the dichotomy between good and evil, what we face most clearly is the unnerving struggle between order and chaos. To survey the state of the nation and the world it isn’t hard to see which way we’re headed.

The perpetual fight against terror, mismanaged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the crumbling economy and the erosion of our must trusted institutions are just the most obvious signs of what America has become. We all sense something wrong, most evident in our own increasing stress and desperation. The frustration is only compounded in that little exists to offer voice to this dread. Hollywood has certainly been no help up until now. Up until now.

The name of the movie is the Dark Knight, but it’s the Joker that steals the show, and in his shadow we find a true reflection of modern America and the choices that we must now make.

In many ways the critical praise is right on the money. The action scenes are phenomenal. The pace is quick. The story weaves in and out among dozens of characters creating multiple layers of conflicting interests, motives and flaws. The acting is impressive.

The city of Chicago filling in as Gotham sets a choking, stressful mood that’s both familiar and unnerving to any urbanite. Modern yet antiquated, gargantuan yet claustrophobic. This isn’t the over the top fantasy world of Tim Burton or even the semi-fantasy of Batman Begins, it’s the real city, inhabited by real people. It’s stark and isolating. It’s a city that serves as microcosm for our entire society, where the forces that are to protect us are often as corrupt and broken as those that would rob us of all the things we find most precious. As is the case in Gotham, these two elements are often one and the same.

In this every-city, director Chris Nolan sets the stage. Not for a war between good and evil, but between order and chaos. And what’s most brilliant about the ensuing struggle, is that ultimately all civilization is filtered through the rise and fall of just one man.

Christian Bale and his all-star supporting cast carry on where they left off with admirable strength (with the exception of Maggie Gyllenhaal filling in for the lackluster Katie Holmes). All around the performances are more than you’d expect from a superhero flick. Bale’s eccentric Bruce Wayne is arrogant and tortured. Gary Oldman, Michael Cain, Morgan Freeman reprise their roles displaying even more humanity than they had in the first one.

But more than anyone else it’s Heath Ledger’s Joker that leaves the most lasting impression. He’s not just an agent of destruction or a two-dimensional psychotic murderer, in Ledger’s hands he’s the puppet master of the show. Pacing like a caged wounded animal, the Joker’s presence is often chilling and ultimately truthful. He is not only the stuff of nightmares, but the darkest recesses of what lies within us all.

As the Joker reminds us time and time again, we live on a very thin line. People are just one step away from unleashing untold brutality on one another. Good men are just one step from turning bad. Although the canvas is Gotham city, the lab rat is Aaron Eckhart’s masterfully played Harvey Dent.

Dent, a rising white knight, a real hope in the darkness of night, ultimately becomes the focus of the Joker’s “social experiment,” and proves the master’s point. No man is above corruption. No man can stand alone.

If Heath Ledger’s death did not seem tragic before, it’s only after seeing what he’s created out of a comic book character that the full loss of this actor can truly be felt. The Joker isn’t chilling because he’s evil, he’s chilling because of the chaos he’s able to create. He’s terrifying because seemingly without effort he’s able to make us all cross that very thin line.

If there was one problem with The Dark Knight, is that as it is a Batman movie, Batman had to make an appearance now and again. The realism and the poignancy of the story are almost derailed by the man in the bat suit. Almost.

The bottom line is this: the Dark Knight is an incredibly ambitious film and unlike the majority of movies this summer, it delivers in full force. But more than that it’s one of the very few films in recent history that actually addresses the current state of what the United States is, and just how close we are to the abyss. Not bad for a franchise blockbuster.

Film Review — Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

May 23rd, 2008 by Hoopleton

George Lucas is hardly new to the art of over-reliance on special effects in lieu of a plot, or the giddy destruction of his own legacy with the blunt axe of unwanted, unnecessary and torturously awful sequels (or prequels, as the case may be). At the very same time Steven Spielberg is a master of derailing movies thanks to a hysterically unfunny sense of humor and what can only be a fetish for speed over storytelling. I’m not really sure which of the two is the bigger waste of a film budget (though I think George Lucas still holds the lead), but what I am sure of is that the two of them together seem to form a perfect storm of cartoonish incompetence and unbelievably bad taste.

I went to see Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and now, barely thirty minutes after limping out of the theater a broken man, I’m suddenly wondering if it were somehow possible for me to build a time machine so that I can go back in time and stop myself from ever buying the ticket.

I honestly don’t know where to start. Should I write about how transcendentally, unbelievably, categorically fucking bad the movie was? Should I spend the next thousand words making a case for why George Lucas and Steven Spielberg should be stoned in the public square, or at the very least, marooned on some deserted island as far away from computers and film equipment as humanly possible? Should I go through the film reviews I read and attempt to find the coded pleas for help that critics must have hidden in their articles as they were obviously forced at gunpoint to give this unimaginably horrible movie their praise? Or should I just walk away from the computer right now, get my hands on as many pills as I can and a bottle of Absolute and pray that the resulting brain damage will make me forget the last two hours of my life?

All right. All right, to be fair maybe I should talk about the good parts of the movie, which should be easy as there were only three.

The beginning action scenes, where the 65-year-old Harrison Ford (or should I say his obviously much younger stunt double) does battle with Soviets disguised as American GIs and survives a nuclear explosion by hiding in a refrigerator (yes, you heard right), are definitely fun to watch if you walk into the theater having suspended any sense of realism or any expectations higher than the floor. Also surprisingly good is the next major action scene involving the intrepid archaeologist and his new sidekick (who you guess immediately to be his son if you have even half a brain cell working) as they avoid capture in a high-speed chase through the streets and walkways of a University, though I warn you that this part is only enjoyable if you suddenly allow Steven Spielberg to hit that Indiana Jones nostalgia button that he seems to have fastened to your head. Finally, the one other good part of the movie is the sudden appearance of the wide-eyed Karen Allen reprising her role as Indiana’s old flame from Raiders of the Lost Ark, Marion Ravenwood, though to be honest you start wishing almost immediately that her role was just that, an appearance.

The only major problems with the three “good” parts of this awful, awful mess of a movie, are that they are constantly interrupted by what I can only guess passes as plot development in the diseased Lucas/Spielberg brain and that all three happen within the first hour. Yup, it’s all downhill from there. And my God, what a steep decline it is. Except for a few somewhat enjoyable laughs throughout the rest of this seemingly endless Bataan Death March of obsurdity, there is only one other thing to look forward to. The end. No, not the ending, the end. The long overdue appearance of end credits is like a religious revelation; it gave me the kind of sensation that I imagine is only reserved for pardoned death row inmates and children rescued from wells.

Now I know. I know. Some of you may end up going to see this “film,” and you may actually find that you liked it, as I’m sure was the feeling of the dozen or so what I can only guess to be highly medicated people in my crowded theater who actually applauded. If you are one of the few unfortunate souls who actually thinks that Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is worth watching, all I can really say to you is that you need serious professional help. It’s nothing to be ashamed of, really. Go see someone.

The bottom line is this: George Lucas and Steven Spielberg must be stopped. If an argument had to be made for the eroding and corrupting influence of power and wealth I don’t think a more prime example could ever be found. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull represents everything that is wrong in modern movie-making. From its overuse of computerized special effects, its complete lack of character development, its shabby storytelling, its absolute misuse of what were once good, respectable actors, all the way to its almost pathological obsession with itself and its marketing legacy, this movie is a masterpiece of modern blockbuster trough cinema and ultimately is just fucking bad. There are no other words. It’s just fucking bad.

Thank you once again George, Steven, for destroying yet another beloved movie franchise.

Looptopia!

May 3rd, 2008 by Hoopleton

Rain descended on the city, water pouring down in sheets. The temperatures dropped. The wind blew hard and swarms of people ran for the cover of buildings and sidewalk umbrellas. All at once the light seemed to disappear out of the sky, carpeting the tall skyscrapers of Chicago in a glittering darkness. But I didn’t run, instead I stood my ground against the water and against the cold and watched as a performance troop in grotesque masks, wielding ropes, locks and bicycle tires put on a spectacle in the middle of Federal Plaza in Chicago’s Loop. In that moment, as music blared from a tent behind me, as a mobile stage rolled through the crowd, as the actors screamed and chanted at the top of their lungs and as the water soaked through my coat, I knew that my May 2nd was going to be a very interesting night.

The name of the event was Looptopia, billed by the organizers as ” America’s first dusk-to-dawn cultural and artistic spectacle showcasing the vibrancy and excitement of Chicago’s historic Loop neighborhood through musical and theatrical performances, unique shopping and dining opportunities, indoor programs, outdoor exhibitions, architectural tours, artistic installations and mesmerizing light displays.” Yea, I guess the official description of the event is accurate, but to me it would be more appropriate to describe the whole thing as a wonderful chorus of free creative chaos. Hundreds of artists descending on the streets till sunrise to display, inspire and confound – if only this could be life in Chicago on a daily basis.

If I have one criticism of Looptopia is that there’s simply no way to experience it all. As in everything in life decisions have to be made. Priority lists have to be drawn. There’s just too damn much to see, but in that there’s a certain freedom. Accepting the fact that you won’t see everything allows you to drift. And drift is what I did. I got there at six, grabbed a program and just let instinct guide me. I just walked, listened to music and allowed myself the freedom to go wherever I wanted. Creativity, inspiration – these things are made out of chaos, so whay should I try and impose order on my night?

I stumbled onto a short film series at DePaul University and watched as kite runners on stilts tossed clown noses to passers by on the hectic city streets. I walked the halls of the Art Institute in the late hours of the night and listened to Gypsy jazz at the Cultural Center as a sketch comedy troop performed three minute improve on a continual loop. I watched a percussion group make rhythm out of garbage cans, I caught a midnight hip-hop show at the Civic Center and watched a series of street performers doing thirty-second sketches between red light changes on Michigan Avenue.

One of the creative highlights for me was the ghostLIGHT one-man street performances on small stages arranged all along the main shopping district. Performers acted out a series of abstract pieces, each dressed in white and illuminated by the glow of a single lightbulb. One woman cared for a mechanical doll with macabre tenderness, another went through the motions of martial arts to empty a bowl of gummy bears one piece of candy at a time, but my favorite was the performance of a masked man writhing in agony and madness in a prison without any walls. For this last act it was almost as much fun to watch the reactions of passers-by as it was to watch him.

But the most incredible part of my night came just an hour after I came to the Loop at a performance called the Humechanical Nightmare. An abstract, sometimes comic, sometimes disturbing forty minute piece depicting the loss of innocence amidst tribal chaos in a post-industrial world where the sleeper is often the victim of her own dreams. I don’t usually like interpretive art that overdoes the costume and the mask, but I also usually don’t see the dismembering of human frailty so well captured and so completely full of truth. It was a mesmerizing act that not even a full force deluge could hope to undermine. Though I think the rain only added to the moment, the sudden absence of sunlight enforcing the bleakness of the story being told. Later, as I was using a hand dryer at a public restroom to dry my coat and hat, I couldn’t help but smile at the fun I’d already had.

On the whole of course there were problems with the event. Yes, most venues were crowded. Yes, the CPD was out in force, looking sternly at anyone having too much fun. Yes, options became limited as the sun began to reappear. Points of criticism can easily be found. I for one didn’t like that street traffic was still allowed. But to focus on the negatives takes away from the spirit of the night. Events such as this give us all a chance to admire the city in which we live. Events such as this connect the artistic community and help foster the thirst for shared ideas.

Looptopia ended for me under the vaulted ceiling of the Victorian-inspired Auditorium Theater just before dawn. I sat in a box that I could normally never afford to sit in overlooking the stage , watching vaudeville acts and musical comedy troupes, drinking vodka with cranberry, smirking at the lowbrow humor and enjoying the solidarity of the crowd. If only for one night Chicago was really our city. If only for one night the arts ruled the streets.